Nickel Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Identification, Treatment, and Prevention

Review and Synopsis by Jalal Maghfour, MD and Alina Goldenberg, MD of Original Peer-Reviewed Article:

Silverberg NB, Pelletier JL, Jacob SE, Schneider LC; SECTION ON DERMATOLOGY, SECTION ON ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY. Nickel Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Identification, Treatment, and Prevention. Pediatrics. 2020;145(5):e20200628. doi:10.1542/peds.2020-0628

Nickel (Ni) remains one of the most common causes of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), a type IV hypersensitivity reaction, since the publication of its first case in 1888 by Dr. George Henry Fox. This metal continues to be highly prevalent in every day goods within the US. Ni ACD is considered a public health issue and has been gaining international attention.

The impact of nickel on both adults and children has been increasingly reported in the literature. However, Ni ACD is primarily a disease of the young as it rarely affects elderly (> 60 years). In this synopsis, we provide a brief overview on an article written by Silverberg et al. in which the authors discussed epidemiology, clinical presentation, pathogenesis and management of Ni ACD among pediatric population.

With the discovery of Ni in the 18th century and advancement in the steel industry in early 19th century, Ni has become commonly utilized among manufacturers and is now considered the 5th most common metal in the world. Ni ACD may manifest as mild pruritus with ill-defined erythema to diffuse and pronounced redness with oozing and bullae. Classically, Ni ACD presents as an erythematous lichenified papule/plaque and matches the object touching the specific skin area. Any parts of the body can be affected by nickel.

Ni ACD has a multifactorial etiology with a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Contact with nickel is simply not enough for a reaction to occur. The following conditions must be met for both induction and elicitation phase to occur: 1) Contact with a metal containing corroded Ni, 2) degree of solubility of Ni (higher the solubility the higher ion leakage); 3) Ni ions being absorbed by the skin.

In case of a Ni ACD, the majority of diagnoses are clinical. However, when the cutaneous patterns are atypical, the diagnosis may be difficult in which cases patch testing can be performed. Patch testing is the criterion standard method to diagnose Ni ACD. While it is usually a localized reaction, the appearance of 3 large papules following Ni patch testing strongly suggests a systemic nickel hypersensitization.  

Ni ACD can be a diagnostic challenge in AD patients as the morphologic eruption may not match the triggering object. In addition, patients may also experience an exacerbation of their AD. In parallel, adults with psoriasis often experience flare of their disease during a Ni ACD episode. Although Ni ACD is primarily a type IV reaction, immediate hypersensitivity through IgE has been reported as a cause of Ni ACD.

For Ni ACD treatment, this review recommends the avoidance of the offending agent as the next best step in management, followed by the treatment of inflammation with the use of glucocorticoids (potency is based on the affected area). Finally, restoration of the skin barrier is essential. This can be performed with a generous application of emollients. 

As exemplified by Denmark and Finland, enacting a national policy to regulate the amount of Ni that a population is exposed to was proven efficacious in reducing the rate of Ni ACD and has increased awareness on the topic among adolescents. There is no such regulation within the US. Because Ni is primarily found in jewelry and ear piercings, it may be beneficial to regulate Ni found in other forms of jewelry, as well as children’s toys, metal protectors for phone which are now increasingly recognized to as a cause of Ni ACD.

Increased production and manufacturing regulations, specific diagnoses and focused avoidance strategies can make Ni ACD a preventable pediatric health issue.  As it was shown with European countries, the United States can benefit from limiting Ni exposure to its population.  Until then, individual awareness and knowledge of daily objects containing nickel should be encouraged as part of avoidance.

Free Article: IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME-LIKE DISORDERS IN ENDOMETRIOSIS: PREVALENCE OF NICKEL SENSITIVITY AND EFFECTS OF A LOW-NICKEL DIET. AN OPEN-LABEL PILOT STUDY.

Authors: Borghini RPorpora MGCasale RMarino MPalmieri EGreco NDonato GPicarelli A

Journal: Nutrients. 2020 Jan 28;12(2). pii: E341. doi: 10.3390/nu12020341.

Abstract

Alimentary nickel (Ni) may result in allergic contact mucositis (ACM), whose prevalence is >30% and may present with IBS-like and extra-intestinal symptoms. These symptoms are also frequent in endometriosis, and Ni allergic contact dermatitis has already been observed in endometriosis. Therefore, intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms in endometriosis may depend on a Ni ACM, and a low-Ni diet could improve symptoms. We studied the prevalence of Ni ACM in endometriosis and focused on the effects of a low-Ni diet on gastrointestinal, extra-intestinal, and gynecological symptoms. We recruited 84 women with endometriosis, symptomatic for gastrointestinal disorders. Thirty-one out of 84 patients completed the study. They underwent Ni oral mucosa patch test (omPT), questionnaire for intestinal/extra-intestinal/gynecological symptoms, and a low-Ni diet. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline (T0) and after three months (T1). Twenty-eight out 31 (90.3%) patients showed Ni omPT positive results, with Ni ACM diagnosis, whereas three out of 31 (9.7%) patients showed negative Ni omPT. After three months of low-Ni diet, all gastrointestinal, extra-intestinal and gynecological symptoms showed a statistically significant reduction. Ni ACM has a high prevalence in endometriosis and a low-Ni diet may be recommended in this condition to reduce gastrointestinal, extra-intestinal and gynecological symptoms.

Link to article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012984

Nickel in Cocoa – speciation

Food Chem. 2017 Sep 1;230:327-335. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.050. Epub 2017 Mar 10.

Nickel speciation in cocoa infusions using monolithic chromatography – Post-column ID-ICP-MS and Q-TOF-MS.

Abstract

Nickel (Ni) is considered to be a potentially harmful element for humans. Its levels in foodstuffs are normally low (below 0.2mgkg-1), but sensitive individuals may develop allergy to Ni as a result of dietary consumption. Cocoa contains relatively high Ni concentrations (around 3mgkg-1). Ni bioavailability, its role in the flavour of food and its potential impact on human health depends primarily on its chemical species. However, there is a lack of information about Ni speciation in cocoa. In this work Ni species were separated on a weak convective interaction media diethylamine (CIM DEAE) monolithic chromatographic column and quantified by the post-column isotope dilution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ID-ICP-MS). The Ni binding ligands in the separated fractions were identified “off line” by quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Q-TOF MS). Ni was found to be present in the cocoa infusions as Ni2+ and Ni-gluconate and Ni-citrate complexes.

low nickel diet

Low Nickel Diet article

Low Nickel Diet: A Patient-Centered Review

‘ A meta review by Jensen specifically assessed elicitation of SCD due to nickel ingestion, and found that 1% of those sensitized to nickel react to the nickel content of a “normal” diet, defined as 0.22 mg, 0.35 mg, or 0.53 mg [12]. Furthermore, a dose-response relationship was revealed showing 10% of nickel sensitized patients responding to exposures between 0.55 mg and 0.89 mg. Such low exposures can be easily attained by consuming foods high in nickel content.  …many patients sensitized to nickel are unaware that dietary exposure may play a role in their morbidity.’  A low nickel diet may help them get their rashes better.

To read more about the Low Nickel Diet: A Patient-Centered Review click here:

http://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/low-nickel-diet-a-patientcentered-review-2155-9554-1000355.php?aid=73356

Low-nickel diet scoring system for systemic nickel allergy – Review

Original article: HERE

Mislankar M, BS, Zirwas MJ, MD. Low-nickel diet scoring system for systemic nickel allergy. Dermatitis. 2013;24:190-5.

Review by Annelise Rasmussen, BS. MSI, Loma Linda University

In patients with severe recalcitrant allergic contact dermatitis a low nickel diet may improve skin symptoms. Symptom severity directly correlates to the amount of ingested. Therefore, a low nickel diet can reduce cutaneous manifestations of nickel allergy.

Mislanker and Zirwas propose a point-based diet centered upon the nickel content of various foods in order to help patients lower nickel intake and therefore reduce symptoms. Guidelines included in the proposed diet include[1]:

  • Be persistent, the low nickel diet may take up to 2 months before improvement.
  • Limit dietary intake of nickel to less than 150 μg/day. This limit may be lowered in cases of children or more sensitive patients to 100 μg/day.
  • One point is assigned for every 10 μg of nickel consumed, giving a daily limit of 15 points.
  • In general high nickel foods such as all beans, chocolate, soy, nuts, oatmeal, and granola should be avoided.
  • Stainless steel cookware should not be used when preparing or cooking acidic foods such as tomatoes, vinegar, or citrus.
  • Vitamin C tablets can help prevent nickel from being absorbed in the gut. All other vitamins or supplements should be avoided.
  • Bottled or distilled water should be used for drinking and cooking.

 

[1] Mislankar M, BS, Zirwas MJ, MD. Low-nickel diet scoring system for systemic nickel allergy. Dermatitis. 2013;24:190-5.

 

Find out more about foods that contain nickel in our dedicated guide to a low nickel diet HERE.

 

Easter Bunny Allergic Contact Dermatitis

Chocolate Easter Egg Systemic Allergic Contact Dermatitis

Easter Bunny Allergic Contact Dermatitis

Original article:

Sharon E. Jacob, MD, Dathan Hamann, BS, Alina Goldenburg, BA, Elizabeth A. Connelly, MD Easter Egg Hunt Dermatitis: Systemic Allergic Contact Dermatitis Associated with Chocolate Ingestion PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, Vol 32 ¡ No 2 ¡ 2015 pg 231-233

Review by James (Keith) Parker, BS. MSI, Loma Linda University

The North American Contact Dermatitis Group has found that there is a strong co-occurrence of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) and atopic dermatitis (AD) in children.

Nickel is an especially common contact allergen in children, with an estimated prevalence of 26.2% in patch tested children!

Patients with ACD may experience systemic contact dermatitis (SCD) after ingestion of certain foods or certain drugs. Dietary restrictions can be used to avoid flares of ACD. The Jacob et al[i]. article reviewed a series of four case reports of nickel-sensitized children with AD that showed:

* Avoidance of “everyday” foods such as: peanuts, peanut butter, chocolate, oats, and processed American cheese – cleared 60 to 80% of their dermatitis when used along with standard therapeutics that had failed alone previously

* Each child had a flare about 48 to 96 hours after Easter Sunday

* Without their parents knowledge the children had binged on chocolate

* It is recommended to consider restricting chocolate consumption in children with nickel sensitization and widespread dermatitis

* The following foods contain 11 micrograms to more than 100 micrograms per serving of nickel: sunflower seeds – oat ring cereal – chocolate candy bars – chocolate syrup – granola with raisins – lima beans – chocolate chip cookies – brownies – pinto beans

 

[i] Sharon E. Jacob, MD, Dathan Hamann, BS, Alina Goldenburg, BA, Elizabeth A. Connelly, MD Easter Egg Hunt Dermatitis: Systemic Allergic Contact Dermatitis Associated with Chocolate Ingestion PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, Vol 32 ¡ No 2 ¡ 2015 pg 231-233

Article by Peter Gust